Capital now fleeing Russia.
Makes good sense too.
FN: China tech stock fraud bubble.
Very much to be expected.
Friday, September 30, 2011
Saturday, September 10, 2011
BANK TANK IS GOOD FOR DEGLOBBALIZATION
Big bank tank will show globalist panders where things really can go with this nonsense.
Their solution for big bank tank would be, very 'technical':
you guessed it,
more globalization.
Think 'medieval' cure for almost all illnesses: bleeding.
Doctors, until the mid 19th Century:
"Oh he's not recovering,
must need to be bled more.........."
Their solution for big bank tank would be, very 'technical':
you guessed it,
more globalization.
Think 'medieval' cure for almost all illnesses: bleeding.
Doctors, until the mid 19th Century:
"Oh he's not recovering,
must need to be bled more.........."
Friday, September 9, 2011
RE THE ROAD TO SERFDOM
Globalization, not communism, really has been the road to serfdom for the Western middle class.
Friday, September 2, 2011
Globbalization in the details
Although globbalization looks rather like the title illustration in some ways,
the dirty details of globbalization and the febrile tantacles of MNCs ,
and cross governmental activities, more closely resemble spaghetti.
Saturday, August 27, 2011
BBC JAPAN FUND TO HELP ITS BUSINESSES RE STRONGER YEN
"A stronger currency hurts Japan's export dependent economy." (And if Japan's economy is weak as a kitten, as Americans have long been lectured by economists, why is their currency so strong now, pray ask the same economists?)
Why should a 'stronger' currency 'hurt'?
Because of misplaced priorities. If you are dependent on exports (misplaced priority), you think you want a currency weaker than your target currency.
Yet resource weak countries, like Japan, had no choice in the struggle for dominance but to become attacker exporter states, predicated in part at first on a weak yen (the 50s 60s).
The solution (for us) would have been to nip their aspirations in the bud, back then, rather than to have fed them and thereby weakened our domestic economy, and thence our 'currency' as well.
Of course there is and has long been a chorus of objections from the Presidency, state and defense.
What have these 'reasons', grounds, amounted to, in the long run?
Wind, Zephyr, air.
Terms search also: Mary Poppins, dumb dumber, on the other blog's Bing.
Why should a 'stronger' currency 'hurt'?
Because of misplaced priorities. If you are dependent on exports (misplaced priority), you think you want a currency weaker than your target currency.
Yet resource weak countries, like Japan, had no choice in the struggle for dominance but to become attacker exporter states, predicated in part at first on a weak yen (the 50s 60s).
The solution (for us) would have been to nip their aspirations in the bud, back then, rather than to have fed them and thereby weakened our domestic economy, and thence our 'currency' as well.
Of course there is and has long been a chorus of objections from the Presidency, state and defense.
What have these 'reasons', grounds, amounted to, in the long run?
Wind, Zephyr, air.
Terms search also: Mary Poppins, dumb dumber, on the other blog's Bing.
Thursday, August 25, 2011
RE THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM AND POST WWII GOBBLELIZATION
It is little appreciated, but our two party system itself fed into the Cold War, Faux War, boom, leading directly to the decline of the West.
Fighting Communism became a bipartisan agenda. (The democratic party before the war had been very sympathetic to, and infiltrated by, Soviet communists.)
Helping develop the Third World, both for humanitarian religious and environmental reasons, was a Democratic plank, mostly, I think.
Booming individual and corporate profits by foreign market expansion and eventually large foreign investments, was a big part of both Democratic and Republican agendas, and the Republicans eventually fully embraced the free trade which the Democrats had almost always, including before the Civil War, favored.
Just to take one huge example, of an ostensibly Democrat ideology sponsored initiative, carbon credit environmentalism, one has only to look and see how this notion has been jammed up the derriere of the West by China especially.
The Republicans like those factories,
the Democrats like those carbon credits.
The Chinese love both.
Imagine why.
Fighting Communism became a bipartisan agenda. (The democratic party before the war had been very sympathetic to, and infiltrated by, Soviet communists.)
Helping develop the Third World, both for humanitarian religious and environmental reasons, was a Democratic plank, mostly, I think.
Booming individual and corporate profits by foreign market expansion and eventually large foreign investments, was a big part of both Democratic and Republican agendas, and the Republicans eventually fully embraced the free trade which the Democrats had almost always, including before the Civil War, favored.
Just to take one huge example, of an ostensibly Democrat ideology sponsored initiative, carbon credit environmentalism, one has only to look and see how this notion has been jammed up the derriere of the West by China especially.
The Republicans like those factories,
the Democrats like those carbon credits.
The Chinese love both.
Imagine why.
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
RE GOBBLIZATION OF APPLE IN ASIA IS ACCELERATING
The race is on to see who can gobble more of Apple faster,
Korea or China.
What with China having even gobbled the store motifs, many fake Apple Stores, and Samsung gobbling the devices,
who is better at gobblelization at the moment,
China or Korea?
You tell me.
Korea or China.
What with China having even gobbled the store motifs, many fake Apple Stores, and Samsung gobbling the devices,
who is better at gobblelization at the moment,
China or Korea?
You tell me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)